NIO Questions the Authenticity of Li Auto's Comparison Test

[Corporate Dispute] Ma Lin, Vice President of NIO, publicly questioned the authenticity of a video released by Li Auto comparing the chassis performance of the Li L9 and the NIO ES9.

Core Issue: Test Logic Contradicts Product Specifications

The NIO ES9’s suspension support in Standard mode should be firmer than in Ultra-Soft mode, yet the video published by Li Auto shows nearly identical body roll between the two modes—contradicting the vehicle’s factory settings. NIO has called on Li Auto to clarify the video’s source, testing conditions, and suspension configurations.

Key Facts: Video Removed, Controversy Escalates

The comparison video was initially posted on June 5th morning via Li Auto’s official mini-program and was removed from all platforms within hours, though it continues circulating online. As of now, Li Auto has not issued an official response.

Strategic Context: Divergent Technical Approaches Spark Public Debate

The NIO ES9 features a 48V integrated electro-hydraulic active suspension, while the Li L9 Livis pursues a different full-active suspension path. The chassis performance of both flagship SUVs has become a focal point, with NIO inviting users to visit dealerships for test drives to experience the real-world difference.